Are we misleading people?

I wonder how many of the lurkers are here because they have been searching for something risqué and stumbled across us.

If you look at the titles of some of our threads I bet a few have opened them thinking they would find something - instead all they got was a lot of old wotsits having fun.

Name and Shame ......... Bedtime attire ........ T-shire of the year ........ Ah well serves them right

Nice one Gypsy, I will start one now then to get them all going.

I think I had a pussy thread, in the old days.

Perfectspecimen wrote:I think I had a pussy thread, in the old days.

That could be interesting - Thread title - Whose seen Vince's pussy????

Gypsy wrote:

That could be interesting - Thread title - Whose seen Vince's pussy????

the lurkers will think its a porn site. .

cunningham wrote:the lurkers will think its a porn site. .

Maybe they'll join in then!

cunningham wrote: the lurkers will think its a porn site. .

Better than their usual pawn site though !

Jimandsi wrote:Better than their usual pawn site though !

hi jim nice of you to join us, your mate mich has been looking for you.

Why's that then - I haven't got any money.

Or a property to sell.

Or want to go on a cut price trip anywhere.

Maybe he/she wants my €uro's for next week's party - that sounds a right bundle of laughs.

Jimandsi wrote:
Why's that then - I haven't got any money.

Or a property to sell.

Or want to go on a cut price trip anywhere.

Maybe he/she wants my €uro's for next week's party - that sounds a right bundle of laughs.

funny, i didnt get a invite, whats the venue, a phone box?

Topdog wrote:

perfect,a long as they keep moving round ,might give the appearance of being full

Topdog wrote:

are they the estate agents with there spouses?

That is there Grand Kidz

Topdog wrote:That is there Grand Kidz

of course, they look far to happy for estate agents.

Is that Jim behind the bar looking very friendly or his he really two faced.

Gypsy wrote:I wonder how many of the lurkers are here because they have been searching for something risqué and stumbled across us.

If you look at the titles of some of our threads I bet a few have opened them thinking they would find something - instead all they got was a lot of old wotsits having fun.

Name and Shame ......... Bedtime attire ........ T-shire of the year ........ Ah well serves them right

Sorry Guys you know me not a trouble maker but why start a thread like this - makes me wonder if you are not missing an old uhuuuummmmmm forum ? Why worry about what lurkers may or may not be thinking. Shouldn't you be welcoming them with open arms, not fears of doubt ?

May put some people off like myself in the first place GYPSY my dear.

A hug and a kiss wouldn't go a miss .....

innit wrote:
Is that Jim behind the bar looking very friendly or his he really two faced.

nah, jimbos not limited to two faces.

Total fun Monkey, hugs and kisses for all...........don't be put off peeps you can come on here and take the mick out of any of us, we do.

Good thanks for that need somewhere to get the beep off my chest

MaltezerMonkey wrote:

Gypsy wrote:I wonder how many of the lurkers are here because they have been searching for something risqué and stumbled across us.

If you look at the titles of some of our threads I bet a few have opened them thinking they would find something - instead all they got was a lot of old wotsits having fun.

Name and Shame ......... Bedtime attire ........ T-shire of the year ........ Ah well serves them right

Sorry Guys you know me not a trouble maker but why start a thread like this - makes me wonder if you are not missing an old uhuuuummmmmm forum ? Why worry about what lurkers may or may not be thinking. Shouldn't you be welcoming them with open arms, not fears of doubt ?

May put some people off like myself in the first place GYPSY my dear.

A hug and a kiss wouldn't go a miss .....

monkey, the lurkers have been welcomed with open arms but with one or two exceptions they have not had the decency to acknowledge us.how ignorant is that?i thought you of all people would see that.i think you need to get to know my mum a little better.

She has been in the sun too much though Howard, kept telling her "not good for the skin", don't listen these younger ones, only 35, she is.

Topdog wrote:She has been in the sun too much though Howard, kept telling her "not good for the skin", don't listen these younger ones, only 35, she is.

nah you are talking bollocks she is 44.

Don't know how to break this to you Pal, she had you very young...........This was her 2 years before you were born.