Australia actually has 5 more medals...bending the rules a wee bit?
5 posters
Hmmm...BBC has England at the top of the medal table
Campbell Brodie-
- Posts : 59106
Join date : 2011-08-13
Age : 69
Location : Scotland
Perfectspecimen-
- Posts : 14451
Join date : 2011-08-15
Age : 70
Location : Cambs / Golf del Sur
No, its gold that counts. I see Wales are good at bringing up the rear.
And England have been showing India how to play cricket too. Been listening to Geoff Boycott commentating, one of Yorkshires finest. Doesnt hold back on his opinions either.
And England have been showing India how to play cricket too. Been listening to Geoff Boycott commentating, one of Yorkshires finest. Doesnt hold back on his opinions either.
Mischief Maker-
- Posts : 896
Join date : 2011-08-24
Age : 40
Location : Scotland
Perfectspecimen wrote:No, its gold that counts. I see Wales are good at bringing up the rear.
And England have been showing India how to play cricket too. Been listening to Geoff Boycott commentating, one of Yorkshires finest. Doesnt hold back on his opinions either.
yeah they are showing that although Australia and England both have the same number of gold, England has more silver (even though in terms of total Australia have more)
i can't be bothered doing the maths but if gold=3points, silver=2 and bronze=1, how would that look?
Edit: i had to do it after all
England 198
Australia 200 - the table should be changed
Mcqueen-
- Posts : 30546
Join date : 2011-08-13
Age : 70
Location : England
Campbell Brodie-
- Posts : 59106
Join date : 2011-08-13
Age : 69
Location : Scotland
OCD innit...
Topdog-
- Posts : 21262
Join date : 2011-08-13
Age : 65
Location : England
5 3 and 1 is the calculation so England 1 point ahead.....