Jimmy Savile sex allegations.

any bloke that wears leather trousers at 70 wants outing

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-39960138

Well at least he's getting what he wanted,,, one of his quotes:-

BBC News. Jury couldn't reach a verdict...

one of those innit....

The headlines say CLEARED.... but if the jury couldn´t reach a verdict then he is only cleared on a technicality.  He could still be VERY VERY GUILTY.

Up here we have a verdict of "Not proven". Which means "we know you did it but we can't gather enough evidence".

Personally i dont see any point in keeping him locked up, he served time his public life is finished
game over,

This is what I don't get with these Jury's like the TV case the other night ,if the first ones that are appointed can't reach a majority verdict get the next lot in untill they can . Can't have guilty people walking about  
I accept Rolfs done his time but is he really innocent of these other crimes  X

I'm dubious about most of these celeb trials. Seems to me that there is a lot of bandwagon jumpers.

What gets me is they come forward now after all these years. They would have told someone years back if true and that person or persons should be called up.  There is no way that an abused person does not disclose to someone once the they are removed from the grips of the abuser.
Other thing Rolf is accused of one account of groping a 15 year olds tits. Now did he stick his hand up her jumper touch on the outside or just brush. Did he know her age and did she come on to him. I know a guy who was on the door of a night club let a bird in she had fake ID he did not know that but she looked the age of 19 and was dropped by her Dad and often attended the club. Often picked up by her Dad too and often very pissed. He goes and shags her and she ends up with Baba, he gets the parents wanted to wreck him and his life even though he says he will support the girl and baby, he was 21. They want him prosecuted and done for technical rape etc. They are the abusers.

3rdforum wrote:I'm dubious about most of these celeb trials. Seems to me that there is a lot of bandwagon jumpers.

Yip, plus it's a bit of an odd one to  manage the justice side of it, think there's been more than one now where theve been banged up for fiddling with one or more, then more come forward and the justice system starts again like with the Harris case, now the guys already in jail for the  crime what do you do if he's found guilty, add to his sentance, that being the case he may never get out of prison if more and more keep coming out of the woodwork.

Should it be the case, especially with these high profile individuals where everyone knows they are being investigated if you have evidence to add to the case (a victim) you come forward with it  at the time of the investigation not some years later, and if you don't then try to bring it up some years later simply be told yip we know he done that sort of thing, he's in prison for it, end off,,, do them for withholding evidence at original trial...