Perfectspecimen wrote:The big new hotel in the valley between San Blas and Los Abrigos. Shitty brown colour with pokey windows.
Is it this one Vince?
A place for visitors and residents to share experiences and have fun at the same time.
Perfectspecimen wrote:The big new hotel in the valley between San Blas and Los Abrigos. Shitty brown colour with pokey windows.
E MUST BE VERY BORING.truth.man wrote:Hi all been extremely busy past week or so. A few naughty chaps and chapesses have been credit card scamming online and taken my time up. Still that's what I am paid for.
Looks like Jack O has woken from his slumber! [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Telling all about the infamous el barranco and Chris Davis. This guy must have a miserable lonely life if all he can do is his continual rant. You would think by now his spelling would have improved. If Chris Davis is as bad as Jack makes him out to be then if I was Jack (err Joel, err Joe) I would not be going out in the dark! He is obviously scarred with hiding behind the facade of someone living in Santa Cruz.
He says in his post “if you witnessed a thief stealing a purse from an old ladies bag it would turn your stomach and you would not stand by and let it happen”. I bet he would not stand by. He’d hide behind a corner till someone else sorted it out. I have met that sort before – when push comes to shove there off. Still at least he hasn’t been giving out the gut churning drivel about the faded superstar Joel David. (yet) Reminds me of Fred Wedlock - Oldest Swinger in Town. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
pollye wrote:I smell a rat! If I remember rightly there were many attempts on the TF to discredit Jack Oakley by so called different people who actually turned out to be the same person i.e the developer???? Sorry Truth.man but your story doesn't ring true to me. Unless you can convince me otherwise, you sound like the same guy who has posted on TF before. I couldn't care less who Jack Oakley is. I just feel sorry for all those affected by a shoddy development.
Just call me a suspicious old bitch but I hear a lot of Jackanory's in my profession. Come to think of it I can spin a few Jackanory's as well, so I apologise if you are genuine but somehow I don't think you are.
P.S Do I get banned for this?
pollye wrote:I smell a rat! If I remember rightly there were many attempts on another forum to discredit Jack Oakley by so called different people who actually turned out to be the same person i.e the developer???? Sorry Truth.man but your story doesn't ring true to me. Unless you can convince me otherwise, you sound like the same guy who has posted on TF before. I couldn't care less who Jack Oakley is. I just feel sorry for all those affected by a shoddy development.
Just call me a suspicious old bitch but I hear a lot of Jackanory's in my profession. Come to think of it I can spin a few Jackanory's as well, so I apologise if you are genuine but somehow I don't think you are.
P.S Do I get banned for this?
truth.man wrote:What do you mean discredit Jack O. He has done that himself. Just take a look at my other posts which show who he really is and his various vested interests. He has a particular grievance due to el barranco and has done for years, you just need to look how long he has been banging on about it – and to what end? The bad guys whoever he claims they may be are still alive and kicking and still going about their business. As I have previously said hiding behind a pseudonym is one thing when you are trying to right a wrong but then Jack spews all that drivel re; Joel David which at the end of the day is a somewhat pathetic attempt to promote himself. My sis recently received copy of the latest PBV AGM and guess who was stirring it about Chris Davis and el barranco but none other than Joseph Murphy of Aries. I have no axe to grind nor have I made any attempts to promote myself or anything I may have an interest in. The rat you smell is not coming from my direction
Topdog wrote:Polly, one day on here and you have totally dis-illusioned me.
I thought he did the Credit Card fraud, I was beginning to think, my sort of geezer.
Cruella de Vil wrote:Does he sell genuine or fake sunglasses?
Yippeee at last! Now where's Jimandsi? I haven't given him an ass whoopin' for ages! Or is it the other way round?Gypsy wrote:
The thing about this forum Pol, is that we can all voice our opinions (we may not always agree) but we are all adults so live and let live.
pollye wrote:Yippeee at last! Now where's Jimandsi? I haven't given him an ass whoopin' for ages! Or is it the other way round?Gypsy wrote:
The thing about this forum Pol, is that we can all voice our opinions (we may not always agree) but we are all adults so live and let live.
I am still waiting for the answer to my question. What has this got to do with PB? You are attacking an individual that is not on here, as far as we know, and everything you say is aimed towards discrediting him. That makes me suspicious because of previous attempts to do the same in various different guises on another forum. You sound like someone who has a vested interest in El Barranco not PB.truth.man wrote:
Sorry Pol I think the crust on your head is a little bit thicker than you realise. What I do is what I do. I don’t pretend otherwise. Unlike a certain Jack O and others it seems. Just arrived and your jumping down my throat. I trust you have no axe to grind as it where. I applaud you however for conjuring up the idea of a certain subterfuge i.e police and timid sister. Diversionary tactics! Well done.
As for what problems PBV have faced down to el barranco? Better ask your mate Jack. Now he does have all the answers or is it all the questions? You have missed, possibly by accident the fundamental points and its nothing at all to do with the price of fish. Or apartments for that matter, although that was my primary concern. Jack O is a blatant liar and what’s more I think he believes his lies. He “cherry picks” from the internet probably and places items out of context and no doubt out of date. Surely this is manifested by the fact he still bears a grudge after all this time. What is it 10 years or so? And as for secret singer – he advertises at every possible opportunity. The only secret is he thinks it’s his secret. He’s fantasy world that he strives to keep a secret. Hey, if I had any sort of artistic talent I would shout it from the tree tops. But I suppose you must have a certain degree of sympathy for someone who will never be more than they have ever been. I suppose he lives in hope.
If you seriously work for the police like you say you do, you would not be making accusations of this kind on an open forum! You would be a lot more subtle and a lot more concise in the way you write. In fact you wouldn't be making accusations at all, it's more than your career would be worth!truth.man wrote:
I came on this forum, as you, invited. Apparently unlike you, I have no previous connections with anyone.
In my last post I believe I answered the question regarding PBV and there is nothing more I can add other than I have no connection whatsoever with el barranco. However if you wish to believe otherwise, that is your choice. Does not worry me one iota neither does your response. But it is curious. You make no mention of who he really is of which there is no doubt.
You use the word “attacking” an individual. Again, your choice. I would prefer to describe it as establishing the identity of someone who hides behind a facade for his own selfish aims and personal benefits and yes he is lying. Jack O claims to be a reporter, working under cover for Granada TV revealing property scams. Tenerife, Cayman Islands, Portugal, South Africa etc etc. Has anyone seen any such broadcasts? In his own words he has been investigating el barranco for 10 years. What financial benefit would any broadcasting company gain in spending 10 years on a single subject? Claims to live in Santa Cruz when in fact he lives in Darwen, Lancashire. Reporters by their profession are supposed to be word perfect. It’s their job. In Jack O’s last post (30/05/2012 13:58) there were 12 fundamental spelling mistakes. Get a reality check. But again if you wish to believe he is what he says he is – your choice and if you benefitted from some of his posts that fine. Interesting when you say “an individual that is not on here, as far as we know” I believe there is enough evidence to prove he is lying furthermore I would welcome a full and open debate with Jack O or should I say Joseph Murphy, but I doubt whether he has the bottle. Or, and this is my guess, would he prefer others to fight his battles?
pollye wrote:
Yippeee at last! Now where's Jimandsi? I haven't given him an ass whoopin' for ages! Or is it the other way round?