pollye wrote:
If you seriously work for the police like you say you do, you would not be making accusations of this kind on an open forum! You would be a lot more subtle and a lot more concise in the way you write. In fact you wouldn't be making accusations at all, it's more than your career would be worth!
This post is a rant! So what if someone makes spelling mistakes? I have a friend with a degree who cant spell for toffee! She was taught phonetics. As I've got older my grammar and spelling has deteriorated drastically.
Look at the above post again. Still on about El Barranco. Why?
The bit where you bring up something I wrote I.E Interesting when you say '' An individual et etc etc'' doesn't end with any explanation as to why it was interesting!!!
If you truly have a sister who wants to sell a property why not ask for advice on here?
The more I read your posts the more I am convinced you are not genuine.
Sorry.
As you are no doubt a master of the English language please indicate the
subtle and concise manner in which I could have better written this.
Now
then, I said I work for the police in that I assist them with their
internet investigation. I am self employed. The police do not employ
their own staff in this particular area.
For your information and
from a legal perspective I can fully uphold my accusations. I hold no
fear as far as that goes. My statements are true and accurate.
Co-incidentally
I have a friend with a degree who can’t spell. His degree is in
psychology so spelling doesn’t matter. But come on! If you sit at the
side of a racing driver you hope at least that he has passed his driving
test. Spelling is a fundamental part of a journalist’s job.
Your
“The bit where you bring up something I wrote I.E Interesting when you
say '' An individual et etc etc'' doesn't end with any explanation as to
why it was interesting!!!” Light on no-one at home? It was the “not
on here as far as we are aware” that he may, under yet another of his
pseudonyms be reading this or even writing. Catch my drift?
As for sis she is not looking for advice and if you had properly read my initial post you would have realised that.
Whilst
you appear to have a furtive imagination you also appear to be
reluctant to challenge my accusations against Jack O. That is also
interesting. Enough said